data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/b40c2/b40c2490dd9d11789e9aac4040b630744c6e6950" alt=""
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/9f3a0/9f3a02763c561b98a317551094c86b267c76a849" alt=""
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/e5239/e5239f4afbef0563354220e41bc2b6dd06510f59" alt=""
Our thesis supervisor have given us a small stack of Jerome Bruner books on narratives and story-making and with titles like Actual minds, possible worlds, we are enjoying every page of it. In Acts of Meaning he pretty much, in his own meta-academic manner, sums up a lot of our feeling-driven behaviour;
But we also know that desire may lead us to find meanings in contexts where others might not. /.../ This reciprocal relation between perceived states of the world and one's desires, each affecting the other, creates a subtle dramatism about human action which also informs the narrative structure of folk psychology. When anybody is seen to believe or desire or act in a way that fails to take the state of the world into account, to commit a truly gratuitous act, he is judged to be folk-psychologically insane unless he as an agent can be narratively reconstructed as being in the grip of mitigating quandary or of crushing circumstances. It may take a searching judicial trial in real life or a whole novel in fiction to effect such a reconstrual. But folk psychology has room for such reconstruals: "truth is stranger than fiction."